Flying Llama
Jun 12, 12:50 PM
Hi Redeye,
I have come accross another bug, or it's my dual G5... or Atszyman is spoking me out! :mad: Like he's ever gonna catch up with me!
This is the case: I have three folding widgets running for over a week now, no problem in that week. I have three because I want to monitor someone behind me (Atszyman) and my next overtake in front of me. But when I just looked all three widgets where on Atszyman.
It's not just the folding tracker widget: I believe there is one preference file for a specific widget, so when dashboard was restarted, it loaded the preference file, and applied it to all folding tracker widgets. Apple should fix this...
3D Linux Wallpaper
3D.fantasy wallpaper.HD
Charming 3D Vector Wallpaper
3D Wide Wallpaper HD Pack
desktop wallpaper hd 3d.
MAC offical Wallpaper HD
3d Wallpapers Hd. 3d
3D Wallpapers HD
MAC offical Wallpaper HD
3D Wallpapers HD
Wallpaper: 3D Wallpaper Hd
wallpaper hd 3d.
I have come accross another bug, or it's my dual G5... or Atszyman is spoking me out! :mad: Like he's ever gonna catch up with me!
This is the case: I have three folding widgets running for over a week now, no problem in that week. I have three because I want to monitor someone behind me (Atszyman) and my next overtake in front of me. But when I just looked all three widgets where on Atszyman.
It's not just the folding tracker widget: I believe there is one preference file for a specific widget, so when dashboard was restarted, it loaded the preference file, and applied it to all folding tracker widgets. Apple should fix this...
Hemingray
Sep 30, 03:59 PM
Originally posted by mr evil brkfast
What about a new 19" widescreen display at the same time?
Or preferrably BEFORE this alleged 19" iMac...
Apple had better make that base wider to visually balance it!
What about a new 19" widescreen display at the same time?
Or preferrably BEFORE this alleged 19" iMac...
Apple had better make that base wider to visually balance it!
stevep
Feb 5, 12:39 PM
Has anyone any experience of running Xara on Virtual PC ? If so, does it install and run ok, or is it like shovelling treacle?
cyberdogl2
May 31, 11:49 AM
i dont think it will work, seeing as many subscription based services still don't do as well as iTunes Music Store, but I'm curious to see how Urge does. Seeing how it has micrsoft's, mtv, and my friend justin timberlakes endorsement and backing.
wrldwzrd89
Dec 2, 04:08 AM
OmniWeb 5.1 beta integrates the latest version of WebCore.
What I'm saying is that The Omni Group needs to do one of two things:
1. Keep updating OnmiWeb as WebCore gets updated.
2. Abandon the integrated WebCore and just use the one built into the system.
Right now, they've chosen path #1 - they're going to have to keep it up, though.
What I'm saying is that The Omni Group needs to do one of two things:
1. Keep updating OnmiWeb as WebCore gets updated.
2. Abandon the integrated WebCore and just use the one built into the system.
Right now, they've chosen path #1 - they're going to have to keep it up, though.
zane
Mar 26, 06:20 AM
I just bought Diddy Kong racing for the DS
xelterran
Sep 29, 09:13 AM
i think it would depend on what apps and OS your using on each comp, if you were using software that recognises dual processors (photoshop etc..) then you prolly wouldnt notice a huge difference but for every-day usage i would have thought the PB800 would be at least 20% faster - thats just my estimate though.
Macrazy
Oct 6, 09:00 PM
Apple is going to use both Motorola and IBM for two reasons.
First reason Apple will use Motorola PPC for low end user such as ibook, iMac, eMac, PowerMac, and xServe. Second reason Apple will use IBM power4 lite for high end user. Such as PowerMac, iMac, Powerbook, xServe and or PowerxServe. Also maybe (Who knows) that Apple will use Power4 (not Lite) for HIGH END Server for xServe.
Anyway, for example IBM offer two things. Intel Pentium4 on IBM computer and run Mirco*****. IBM server run Power4 run Linux Server.
What If.. Apple decide to offer Intel too? (Jeez)
Let's wait till tomorrow.
First reason Apple will use Motorola PPC for low end user such as ibook, iMac, eMac, PowerMac, and xServe. Second reason Apple will use IBM power4 lite for high end user. Such as PowerMac, iMac, Powerbook, xServe and or PowerxServe. Also maybe (Who knows) that Apple will use Power4 (not Lite) for HIGH END Server for xServe.
Anyway, for example IBM offer two things. Intel Pentium4 on IBM computer and run Mirco*****. IBM server run Power4 run Linux Server.
What If.. Apple decide to offer Intel too? (Jeez)
Let's wait till tomorrow.
bousozoku
Dec 18, 07:56 PM
So the script would be the easiest way to go.
It's the only way to go, if you want to work on more than one work unit at a time and since mc68k has done some good work on the scripts, it's also easy to get things going.
It's the only way to go, if you want to work on more than one work unit at a time and since mc68k has done some good work on the scripts, it's also easy to get things going.
wordmunger
Oct 25, 07:53 AM
Firefox is way better than explorer for windows. It has a few little quirks on the Mac that make me stick with Safari, but if Safari doesn't improve its rendering speed soon, I may make the switch.
King Cobra
Sep 12, 08:10 PM
>(Nipsy) Knowing Apple,
Apple IMO only receives the chips, and Motorola should be most responsible for making the chips for Apple.
>if this is true, a G5 may be shipping by November 2003!
This reminds me to back last year with the flamepissed "Upcoming G5, G6, G7" thread, which had information about the G5 going up to 1.6GHz, along with the G6, and the G7. Yet, the G4 Apollo was mentioned to still be supplied by Motorola. So far, we haven't gotten G5s, but we do have a conference this year, to deal out all these issues. From there, more reasonable assumptions should be able to be made, and such sarcasm may not become necessary.
Guys, for those doubting applemacdude, remember what happened with APPLEP58? Almost no one thought he was telling the honest to John truth. And he was. I think certain "newbies" these days with insider information should be trusted until the point they are wrong/right. Then, IF they are wrong, belittle them! :D
applemacdude, do you have any more info?
BTW, if you (to non-contributors) think this is news, check out the Private Stuff. :eek: :p
Apple IMO only receives the chips, and Motorola should be most responsible for making the chips for Apple.
>if this is true, a G5 may be shipping by November 2003!
This reminds me to back last year with the flamepissed "Upcoming G5, G6, G7" thread, which had information about the G5 going up to 1.6GHz, along with the G6, and the G7. Yet, the G4 Apollo was mentioned to still be supplied by Motorola. So far, we haven't gotten G5s, but we do have a conference this year, to deal out all these issues. From there, more reasonable assumptions should be able to be made, and such sarcasm may not become necessary.
Guys, for those doubting applemacdude, remember what happened with APPLEP58? Almost no one thought he was telling the honest to John truth. And he was. I think certain "newbies" these days with insider information should be trusted until the point they are wrong/right. Then, IF they are wrong, belittle them! :D
applemacdude, do you have any more info?
BTW, if you (to non-contributors) think this is news, check out the Private Stuff. :eek: :p
SiliconAddict
Mar 16, 03:55 PM
Are you sure you guys aren't actually getting GoogleX from your browser cache? GoogleX isn't working for me either, and it's not showing up on the Google Labs page anymore either (it used to be there). Try emptying your cache and then reloading the page.
Pretty sure since the first time it was from my desktop in the IT dept and the next was from a server in our server room. :p
Pretty sure since the first time it was from my desktop in the IT dept and the next was from a server in our server room. :p
RacerX
Jun 24, 12:48 PM
According to the book iCon Jobs/NeXT was prevented from hiring any more Apple employees for a period of just six months. However, Jobs had already cherry picked the best people before this statement and those that wanted to go from Apple following Jobs' exit left of their own accord pretty soon after.
Enchanting 3D Vector Wallpaper
52 HD 3D Wallpapers
3D Wide Wallpaper HD Pack
Collection 3D [Wallpapers HD]
wallpaper hd 3d. wallpaper hd
3D iPhone HD wallpaper (3)
Blackcat
Mar 19, 04:14 PM
Does iTunes really only sell you a license to the track? Is this in writing anywhere?
netdog
Jun 9, 02:35 PM
The key to success in today's market is to focus on what you do best. An examination of Apple's moves over the last ten years shows that the company has done precisely that. Apple has dropped its game console, PDAs, digital still cameras, printers, and scanners. Its most recent move was to sell PowerSchool. The results speak for themselves. Apple is wildly successful. So the answer to your question would be "No!"
Ummmmm.........iPod?
Ummmmm.........iPod?
Mr. Anderson
Nov 22, 03:45 PM
eyelike art is still around, ambitiouslemon is on sabatical, kela posted last in April, spikey might be around under a different name, he hasn't been seen in quite some time, and blakespot is off doing his own thing, although I think he still helps arn with the site.
I don't fall under the 'old skool' banner, but I've been around longer than most these days. But maybe you should try a reunion thread, only for anyone who's of a certain age.
D
I don't fall under the 'old skool' banner, but I've been around longer than most these days. But maybe you should try a reunion thread, only for anyone who's of a certain age.
D
redAPPLE
Oct 19, 05:29 AM
i had a dream, that the next generation apple prosumer machine, whould still have the "el capitan" case, but the case would be shiny!!
i would have a mercury (quicksilver) "color" or finish.
it would be semi-see-thru.
if i were good in creating stuff in photoshop, i would try to recreate my "dream" machine.
maybe someone out there would want to give it a shot. and recreate it.
i would have a mercury (quicksilver) "color" or finish.
it would be semi-see-thru.
if i were good in creating stuff in photoshop, i would try to recreate my "dream" machine.
maybe someone out there would want to give it a shot. and recreate it.
TopGear
Oct 25, 06:53 AM
I imagine we'll see disappointment and bitterness all around. And then a few weeks later, redemption and joy. Just your average Apple fan's constant emotional rollercoaster.
swingerofbirch
Apr 16, 02:40 AM
I found another internal site:
http://abs.apple.com/
Apple's own anti-lock brake system technology?
No...it's Apple Business Intelligence (so I'm not quite sure what the S is for)
http://abs.apple.com/
Apple's own anti-lock brake system technology?
No...it's Apple Business Intelligence (so I'm not quite sure what the S is for)
menziep
Jun 28, 10:29 AM
What next?
what with microsoft buying out companies like iView and Lionhead Studios what will be next?
I think abobe might be on Microsoft's List.
Please Post Your Comments
Link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_acquired_by_Microsoft_Corporation - Contains a list of Compaines acquired by MS
what with microsoft buying out companies like iView and Lionhead Studios what will be next?
I think abobe might be on Microsoft's List.
Please Post Your Comments
Link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_acquired_by_Microsoft_Corporation - Contains a list of Compaines acquired by MS
Telomar
Oct 30, 10:14 PM
Originally posted by Kethoticus
...and I agree with you. With Dell coming out with 2.2GHz laptops, I think $3,500 is an awful lot to charge for 1GHz, OS X or not. *groans* When are people going to stop using GHz as their performance metric it just isn't accurate.
Keep in mind Intel is planning to replace the PIVs in the upper end of the mobile line with a chip that will only clock in the mid-1GHz range at launch. Furthermore the high speeds of the PIV-M chip can't be sustained as well as the G4 could sustain its 1GHz.
As far as mobile computing goes I would take an embedded chip like the G4 any day of the week.
...and I agree with you. With Dell coming out with 2.2GHz laptops, I think $3,500 is an awful lot to charge for 1GHz, OS X or not. *groans* When are people going to stop using GHz as their performance metric it just isn't accurate.
Keep in mind Intel is planning to replace the PIVs in the upper end of the mobile line with a chip that will only clock in the mid-1GHz range at launch. Furthermore the high speeds of the PIV-M chip can't be sustained as well as the G4 could sustain its 1GHz.
As far as mobile computing goes I would take an embedded chip like the G4 any day of the week.
MacRumorUser
Mar 20, 07:01 PM
mmm 5.8 mediocre review. :o
http://wii.ign.com/articles/774/774342p1.html?RSSwhen2007-03-20_150000&RSSid=774342
Closing Comments
When it comes to captivating casual gamers, control needs to be simple and intuitive, and the Cooking Mama franchise needs to evolve to do that. We could rant all day about what technically works and why 1:1 motion is important, but in the end it’s an issue of whether or not the game is fun, inviting, and entertaining. The overall consensus; it’s still a fun game, as long as you can ignore some of its faults. The inviting presentation will still bring people in, it’ll still be a blast for certain gamers, and the act of doing motion-controlled cooking pantomime will be a hit with the younger crowd and a niche group of gamers. At the same time, the series has a long way to go before it really “feels right” on Wii, and if nothing else Cooking Mama: Cook Off can act as that first step towards an inevitable improvement. We love the series, but we simply can’t endorse this one. Here’s hoping for a sequel that truly innovates around the controller, rather than borrowing from DS control.
6.5 Presentation
The charming Cooking Mama look and feel hits Wii in full effect. New dishes, new preparation techniques, and a new vs. mode. Not bad.
5.0 Graphics
The game has style, but it also has low-res food, a very basic look, and visuals comparable to DS. It in no way pushes the system. 480p and 16:9 supported though.
5.5 Sound
Classic tunes and Cooking Mama “Engrish” throughout. It’s basic by design, but basic nonetheless.
5.5 Gameplay
Some of the motions transition decently to Wii, while others are best kept on DS. The tactile feel is lost, and with it the game’s immersion. Vs. mode is a definite step in the right direction
6.0 Lasting Appeal
There’s plenty to do, and the vs. mode is a plus, but there’s less pure entertainment in the act of making food with the Wii remote.
5.8
Mediocre OVERALL
(out of 10 / not an average)
Not out till May for Europeans I believe - was hoping this might be a game to keep the non-gamers happy for a while. I might get it still but 5.8 :(
http://wii.ign.com/articles/774/774342p1.html?RSSwhen2007-03-20_150000&RSSid=774342
Closing Comments
When it comes to captivating casual gamers, control needs to be simple and intuitive, and the Cooking Mama franchise needs to evolve to do that. We could rant all day about what technically works and why 1:1 motion is important, but in the end it’s an issue of whether or not the game is fun, inviting, and entertaining. The overall consensus; it’s still a fun game, as long as you can ignore some of its faults. The inviting presentation will still bring people in, it’ll still be a blast for certain gamers, and the act of doing motion-controlled cooking pantomime will be a hit with the younger crowd and a niche group of gamers. At the same time, the series has a long way to go before it really “feels right” on Wii, and if nothing else Cooking Mama: Cook Off can act as that first step towards an inevitable improvement. We love the series, but we simply can’t endorse this one. Here’s hoping for a sequel that truly innovates around the controller, rather than borrowing from DS control.
6.5 Presentation
The charming Cooking Mama look and feel hits Wii in full effect. New dishes, new preparation techniques, and a new vs. mode. Not bad.
5.0 Graphics
The game has style, but it also has low-res food, a very basic look, and visuals comparable to DS. It in no way pushes the system. 480p and 16:9 supported though.
5.5 Sound
Classic tunes and Cooking Mama “Engrish” throughout. It’s basic by design, but basic nonetheless.
5.5 Gameplay
Some of the motions transition decently to Wii, while others are best kept on DS. The tactile feel is lost, and with it the game’s immersion. Vs. mode is a definite step in the right direction
6.0 Lasting Appeal
There’s plenty to do, and the vs. mode is a plus, but there’s less pure entertainment in the act of making food with the Wii remote.
5.8
Mediocre OVERALL
(out of 10 / not an average)
Not out till May for Europeans I believe - was hoping this might be a game to keep the non-gamers happy for a while. I might get it still but 5.8 :(
gopher
Oct 9, 11:09 AM
Research it some more? The subject line of the original post "Did anyone else notice this?" is rather ambiguous, and you wouldn't assume to find it there.
Chryx
Oct 3, 05:42 PM
Originally posted by Telomar