cb911
Oct 9, 07:47 AM
that's cool that we will have such massive storage soon. awesome for all the video, and other production type people.
and what's up with that Verizon DSL?!!:eek: you gotta post a link or something on that...
and what's up with that Verizon DSL?!!:eek: you gotta post a link or something on that...
iN8
Aug 27, 04:00 PM
Originally posted by ftaok
Hmm, hadn't thought about the "chip upgrade" scenario. That's a good one.
Maybe this is where "Junkyard" comes into play.
Hmm, hadn't thought about the "chip upgrade" scenario. That's a good one.
Maybe this is where "Junkyard" comes into play.
SamIchi
Mar 21, 04:46 PM
Mine was warm with Wii connect 24. But now I dont leave it on standby I turn it off anyway.
WiiConnect 24 is an utter waste really. It's not like it downloads the updates for you.
Yea I don't see the point, it's not like there's super important info comin in. I think I'll turn it off too.
WiiConnect 24 is an utter waste really. It's not like it downloads the updates for you.
Yea I don't see the point, it's not like there's super important info comin in. I think I'll turn it off too.
Tiauguinho
Sep 19, 01:57 PM
HEHEHEHE!!! That is great to see!!! Go PowerMac! Flame everything!
bacon
Sep 1, 12:53 AM
Originally posted by mrwalker
Ok, so reimplementing the MacOS Toolbox (even if it's now called "Carbon") on yet another platform is no big task?
Unless Apple didn't learn their lesson the first time, no, it won't be a big task.
Hopefully, there isn't much assembly code in Carbon. If there is, Apple did it to themselves...
Ok, so reimplementing the MacOS Toolbox (even if it's now called "Carbon") on yet another platform is no big task?
Unless Apple didn't learn their lesson the first time, no, it won't be a big task.
Hopefully, there isn't much assembly code in Carbon. If there is, Apple did it to themselves...
d.perel
Mar 18, 03:47 PM
Wish he'd do something useful like cracking WMA.
trees wallpaper, flower
Hibiscus Flower wallpaper
Nature Wallpaper
Beautiful Nature Wallpapers
nature 800x600 Wallpapers
Wallpapers OF Flowers, these
Nature Flower Wallpaper HD 3
Nature 2- Flower Wallpaper
Flower wallpapers 1440x900
Flowers Wallpaper
1600x1200 Carnation Wallpaper
Posted in flowers wallpaper,
Flowers - Nature Wallpaper
paleck
May 25, 10:13 PM
I have my Dual G5 running it full time as well as one of our work servers, but that one is going to be turned off soon. :(
840quadra
May 19, 01:18 AM
OK. Just a friendly piece of advice and empirical observation coming from hours of tweaking G3s, G4s, G5s, P4s, Dual Athlons, and Dual Xeons for maximum efficiency.
I looked at your team, and it appears that the OSX group's numbers tanked, and remain low at near the same time Macrumors did, while more PC based groups do not show such drops. It may not be Tinker related, but it looks like the recent WU's being released by Stanford are not too Macintosh friendly.
I looked at your team, and it appears that the OSX group's numbers tanked, and remain low at near the same time Macrumors did, while more PC based groups do not show such drops. It may not be Tinker related, but it looks like the recent WU's being released by Stanford are not too Macintosh friendly.
dpaanlka
May 16, 04:21 AM
it doesn't feel any faster than my ibook g4
You may very well be the first and only person ever to think that way.
I was at the Apple Store recently and was amazed by even the Mac Mini's tremendous feeling power compared to my 1.8ghz G4.
You may very well be the first and only person ever to think that way.
I was at the Apple Store recently and was amazed by even the Mac Mini's tremendous feeling power compared to my 1.8ghz G4.
Mac_Freak
Apr 24, 09:10 PM
god like powers.... :cool:
actually... when we look at the sourse we notice that apple is using js to determine the movies loaded so... in the js source of file... http://wdirect.apple.com/finalcutstudio/profiles/profiles.js we see the videos are defined and the code for writing out to the page is defined... http://images.apple.com/movies/us/apple/finalcutstudio/'+viewMov+'.mov"
Yeah, I just figured that out too. Very tricky from Apple's side, and very sneaky from yours :D
actually... when we look at the sourse we notice that apple is using js to determine the movies loaded so... in the js source of file... http://wdirect.apple.com/finalcutstudio/profiles/profiles.js we see the videos are defined and the code for writing out to the page is defined... http://images.apple.com/movies/us/apple/finalcutstudio/'+viewMov+'.mov"
Yeah, I just figured that out too. Very tricky from Apple's side, and very sneaky from yours :D
Queso
Jun 18, 02:57 AM
Dr. Oetker frozen foods are the current winners on the crap dubbing scale. Don't you just love the way they cut from the actors mid-sentence when the lip synching between German and English just gets too embarrassing?
Dr. Oetker - A Little Taste of France*
*Made in Germany
:D
Dr. Oetker - A Little Taste of France*
*Made in Germany
:D
cjw
Sep 21, 02:40 PM
Originally posted by King Cobra
Yeah. Apple updated their PowerMacs (1250MHz model) to be ready for shipping.
As for the $5000 model, I think that's ridiculous, considering you can get an extra 512MB from MacMall, I think.
From what I saw when I was shopping for my dual 867 a week or so ago, MacZone has the best deal.
Yeah. Apple updated their PowerMacs (1250MHz model) to be ready for shipping.
As for the $5000 model, I think that's ridiculous, considering you can get an extra 512MB from MacMall, I think.
From what I saw when I was shopping for my dual 867 a week or so ago, MacZone has the best deal.
Brize
Apr 26, 06:23 AM
The law implicitly states that if you OWN a device that is capable of recieving signals you need a license.
From http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/index.jsp:
If you use a TV or any other device to receive or record TV programmes (for example, a VCR, set-top box, DVD recorder or PC with a broadcast card) - you need a TV Licence. You are required by law to have one. [emphasis mine]
From http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/index.jsp:
If you use a TV or any other device to receive or record TV programmes (for example, a VCR, set-top box, DVD recorder or PC with a broadcast card) - you need a TV Licence. You are required by law to have one. [emphasis mine]
Mr. Anderson
Oct 30, 07:39 PM
Originally posted by madamimadam
If only days like those still existed
:)
:)
Waxing nostalgic over the old days is not necessarily a good thing. Rampant flame wars and such didn't really make the forums all that fun - even though there was plenty of other things going on.
For me the best times at MR were in April - July or so.
D
If only days like those still existed
:)
:)
Waxing nostalgic over the old days is not necessarily a good thing. Rampant flame wars and such didn't really make the forums all that fun - even though there was plenty of other things going on.
For me the best times at MR were in April - July or so.
D
g-c
Mar 24, 10:01 PM
ok you guys i've been researching this and i came across a post at onmac.net here's the link http://forum.onmac.net/archive/index.php/t-1532.html
for the lazy ones this is a posters response to a problem similar to ours:
"you need to edit the video.con file to set it to the res of your desktop change the file ext from Video.con to Video.txt then edit it and save it then change the file ext back to Video.con
I doubt its a DirectX error as that normally throws up a (dx blah blah error ) window but to make sure dl the latest dx9 if you want to bypass the WGA downloader look at http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6859/
it lives in /Program Files/Electronic Arts/Battlefield2/mods/BF2/Settings/Profiles/Custom/Video.con
that path may not be exact as im doing it from memory but the file you need to edit is the Video.con file so you could just search for all your Video.con files and edit the resolution in there (def 800 600 32 0 ) mine is set to 1680 1050 32 0 as its on my 17" macbook.
you need to do the same if you want to play the BF 2142
~SIMPLE METHOD~
Right-click your Battlefield 2 desktop icon and click "Properties". Under the "Target field", add this: +szx 1280 +szy 800
This will force Battlefield 2's resolution into the resolution 13" MacBooks use.
Tell me if it works! (i cant test right now)
Good luck w/Battlefield 2!
Didn't seem to do the trick for me. Maybe it will for you..
for the lazy ones this is a posters response to a problem similar to ours:
"you need to edit the video.con file to set it to the res of your desktop change the file ext from Video.con to Video.txt then edit it and save it then change the file ext back to Video.con
I doubt its a DirectX error as that normally throws up a (dx blah blah error ) window but to make sure dl the latest dx9 if you want to bypass the WGA downloader look at http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6859/
it lives in /Program Files/Electronic Arts/Battlefield2/mods/BF2/Settings/Profiles/Custom/Video.con
that path may not be exact as im doing it from memory but the file you need to edit is the Video.con file so you could just search for all your Video.con files and edit the resolution in there (def 800 600 32 0 ) mine is set to 1680 1050 32 0 as its on my 17" macbook.
you need to do the same if you want to play the BF 2142
~SIMPLE METHOD~
Right-click your Battlefield 2 desktop icon and click "Properties". Under the "Target field", add this: +szx 1280 +szy 800
This will force Battlefield 2's resolution into the resolution 13" MacBooks use.
Tell me if it works! (i cant test right now)
Good luck w/Battlefield 2!
Didn't seem to do the trick for me. Maybe it will for you..
MacsRgr8
Sep 11, 04:39 PM
Yes that would be gr8!
This could give Apple alot of options:
All pro-Macs: 64 bit IBM (maybe even quads:) )
All consumer-Macs: 32 bit Moto (maybe even duals)
A very flexible line up. Mhz no issue. I believe that Apple is not using the 1GHz Saharas for the iBook just for the reason that "it sounds more" than an 800 MHz G4. (so much for the MHz-myth campaign
:( ). Being able to sell 64 bit- Mac's will sound gr8, no matter the Mhz.
And this would also settle the score for being totaly dependant of one chip manufacturer.
I like your bet, so I will not bet against it!
This could give Apple alot of options:
All pro-Macs: 64 bit IBM (maybe even quads:) )
All consumer-Macs: 32 bit Moto (maybe even duals)
A very flexible line up. Mhz no issue. I believe that Apple is not using the 1GHz Saharas for the iBook just for the reason that "it sounds more" than an 800 MHz G4. (so much for the MHz-myth campaign
:( ). Being able to sell 64 bit- Mac's will sound gr8, no matter the Mhz.
And this would also settle the score for being totaly dependant of one chip manufacturer.
I like your bet, so I will not bet against it!
cb911
Nov 2, 02:13 AM
i was just reading in another thread about the current TiBooks not being able to fully use DDR RAM. i was just wondering how much truth there is in this?
i'm usually not a very technical person, but on this occasion if someone wants to run me through the theory of why this is not possible then feel welcome.
also, if someone knows of any websites that are about the current TiBook processors and DDR RAM then i wouldn't mind having a read...
i'm usually not a very technical person, but on this occasion if someone wants to run me through the theory of why this is not possible then feel welcome.
also, if someone knows of any websites that are about the current TiBook processors and DDR RAM then i wouldn't mind having a read...
gnasher729
Jun 25, 05:08 PM
My dad needs to get a new laptop (under $800) and he has sent me out to do some research for him. I was thinking dell or HP. I like the dell line, but I cant deside. I could get him a real cheap one with a ntel� Celeron� M for $619. But I have an oversion to "outdated" technology and I want to suggest a Inspiron E1405 with Intel� Core� Solo 1.66GHz for $749. Is ti really worth $150 more?? It'll be used for basic computing. nothing special.
I you have an aversion to outdated technology, why don't you get him to buy a MacBook? It will safe you many many hours of giving free tech support, so it's definitely worth the money ($1199 with 1 GB of RAM).
I you have an aversion to outdated technology, why don't you get him to buy a MacBook? It will safe you many many hours of giving free tech support, so it's definitely worth the money ($1199 with 1 GB of RAM).
OutThere
Mar 27, 09:01 PM
This was pretty heavily discussed here: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=188274
jefhatfield
Sep 25, 12:16 PM
a month away, or less, i can't wait...no matter how many rumors on the subject
a superdrive or new video card would be nice
1 ghz seems likely and the obvious upgrade for tibook
a new enclosure does not seem likely...and with its 1" thin enclosure, who would want to change it?
ok, making it 1.1" to fit superdrive;)
a superdrive or new video card would be nice
1 ghz seems likely and the obvious upgrade for tibook
a new enclosure does not seem likely...and with its 1" thin enclosure, who would want to change it?
ok, making it 1.1" to fit superdrive;)
macrlz9
May 26, 04:10 PM
http://www.myspace.com/boywonder8503 :)
jsw
Oct 26, 09:44 AM
I don't understand how this would be MS's worst nightmare.If IE isn't the 800 lb gorilla of browsers that it is now, MS loses a ton of leverage. Firefox allows people to bypass Windows for a number of things and will start to erode the IE-only focus of so many websites, which will help Safari and other browsers as well. Plus, as people can do more and more with their (non-MS) browsers, it would become easier to move to a non-MS OS (they'd have to learn fewer new things than now, as more familiar options would just port over).
ddtlm
Oct 2, 02:51 PM
Interesting pic.
Not that I have any reason to disbelieve this pic, but has anyone done the usual close-up examinations, looking for photoshopping such as Toms Hardware got caught doing with an "exclusive preview" of unreleased P4's?
Not that I have any reason to disbelieve this pic, but has anyone done the usual close-up examinations, looking for photoshopping such as Toms Hardware got caught doing with an "exclusive preview" of unreleased P4's?
aussie_geek
Apr 12, 03:35 PM
meh,
browsers on consoles suck. period. even the one i have on my ps3 with its almighty 218 gigaflops of power is a slug.
consoles are for games, movies and music.
aussie_geek
browsers on consoles suck. period. even the one i have on my ps3 with its almighty 218 gigaflops of power is a slug.
consoles are for games, movies and music.
aussie_geek