dmw007
Jun 22, 06:14 PM
Oh, and the pending release of Vista.
Which we know to be the most unlikely to be released rumor ever known to mankind. ;) :D
Which we know to be the most unlikely to be released rumor ever known to mankind. ;) :D
RacerX
Apr 4, 12:26 AM
Since I've been using Panther (about a week after it was released) Mail has crashed regularly (usually 1 out of 4 times I've used it). It occurs when quit the app and it just hangs...forever, until I force quit the process.
On the pre-Mac OS X versions of Mail (and MailViewer) all optimization was done manually. But now it is done in the background while Mail is running. If it is hanging when you go to quit, there is a very good chance it is in the middle of doing house keeping and needs a little time to finish. If you force quit while it is doing this you run the risk of damaging the mailboxes that are being optimized which could lead to further crashes and instability of Mail.
I had one client who was, well, impatient with Mail. He wanted it done when he was done with it and force quit Mail when it wouldn't quit when he wanted it to. It was quite a mess recovering his mail when his mailboxes stopped being readable by Mail.
I'm not sure this is what is happening here, but it sorta sound similar.
On the pre-Mac OS X versions of Mail (and MailViewer) all optimization was done manually. But now it is done in the background while Mail is running. If it is hanging when you go to quit, there is a very good chance it is in the middle of doing house keeping and needs a little time to finish. If you force quit while it is doing this you run the risk of damaging the mailboxes that are being optimized which could lead to further crashes and instability of Mail.
I had one client who was, well, impatient with Mail. He wanted it done when he was done with it and force quit Mail when it wouldn't quit when he wanted it to. It was quite a mess recovering his mail when his mailboxes stopped being readable by Mail.
I'm not sure this is what is happening here, but it sorta sound similar.
Capt Underpants
Aug 12, 07:18 PM
Just demote to mac rumors newbie for that.
It's all good. Hopefully you'll join the MR team! Tell us what you decide!
It's all good. Hopefully you'll join the MR team! Tell us what you decide!
pepeleuepe
Oct 3, 01:53 PM
Well, I just stumbled upon this section for the first time, but I think if the forum was moved to the top of the page, then more people would visit and post in it. This would ruin the awesome exclusivness (<--I think it's a word :confused: ) of this forum. Even though no one seems to really post in here, it could be a nice place to have secluded discussion about MR stuff instead of on the General board.
Just my random thought after finding this forum for the first time.
Just my random thought after finding this forum for the first time.
n-abounds
Mar 21, 05:41 PM
I knew someone was goin to comment about the title.
You mean it was unintentional? :eek:
Don't feel bad MacRumorUser...it took me a while to notice.
You mean it was unintentional? :eek:
Don't feel bad MacRumorUser...it took me a while to notice.
wdlove
Dec 31, 11:08 AM
Quicken from Intuit and FileMaker Pro are the ones that I use most often. Really hate to admit this but Entourage that comes with Office 2004 has been very stable.
shamino
Dec 2, 09:22 AM
What I'm saying is that The Omni Group needs to do one of two things:
1. Keep updating OnmiWeb as WebCore gets updated.
2. Abandon the integrated WebCore and just use the one built into the system.
Right now, they've chosen path #1 - they're going to have to keep it up, though.
Choosing path #2 isn't a panacea either.
WebCore, like any suitably large subsystem, has bugs that sometimes have to be worked around. If it's compiled in to the app, Omni can compile in workarounds for any bugs in the version they're using. If they use the system version, they need to build in workarounds for every version a customer may have (meaning every version Apple has shipped for supported versions of MacOS.) And you'll still have to update this as new versions of WebCore are released to customers.
Second, it dilutes the value of the product in the eyes of some customers. If your app is a wrapper around a system-provided component, can you justify the cost of the product solely on the quality of that wrapper?
1. Keep updating OnmiWeb as WebCore gets updated.
2. Abandon the integrated WebCore and just use the one built into the system.
Right now, they've chosen path #1 - they're going to have to keep it up, though.
Choosing path #2 isn't a panacea either.
WebCore, like any suitably large subsystem, has bugs that sometimes have to be worked around. If it's compiled in to the app, Omni can compile in workarounds for any bugs in the version they're using. If they use the system version, they need to build in workarounds for every version a customer may have (meaning every version Apple has shipped for supported versions of MacOS.) And you'll still have to update this as new versions of WebCore are released to customers.
Second, it dilutes the value of the product in the eyes of some customers. If your app is a wrapper around a system-provided component, can you justify the cost of the product solely on the quality of that wrapper?
SamIchi
Mar 21, 05:28 PM
...and the innuendos never stop. :D
I knew someone was goin to comment about the title.
I knew someone was goin to comment about the title.
Sun Baked
Nov 4, 11:26 PM
After all this time, I think it's time to post this for those just finding out about this problem...
groov'
Sep 25, 11:18 AM
at least in Belgium...
Look here
http://www.cubepc.be/
Look here
http://www.cubepc.be/
Diatribe
Jan 4, 10:10 AM
WOW. Those prices are pretty great!
Now when exactly did you get your iMac G5? Oh well, I guess prices are never safe, but now it's gonna be tough to sell my 12" to get a 15" without paying a huge upgrade price. :(
Now when exactly did you get your iMac G5? Oh well, I guess prices are never safe, but now it's gonna be tough to sell my 12" to get a 15" without paying a huge upgrade price. :(
Platform
May 19, 05:54 AM
When you are folding with a DP computer.....is it possible to assign only one of the CPU's to fold so that you have one for all the other thing or :confused:
PlaceofDis
Mar 23, 11:19 AM
cool interface,
someone needs to work on a guide for installation, at least a general one and then we would see this explode
someone needs to work on a guide for installation, at least a general one and then we would see this explode
scem0
Oct 20, 01:59 AM
Originally posted by MacCoaster
Source of that image:
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/images/features/11-13tabletpc2.jpg
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/images/features/11-13tabletpc2.jpg
How lame, copying Microsoft!
I couldn't agree more. I would never expect apple to copy microsoft by copying microsoft because the copied apple. That didn't make the slightest bit of sense. It is 2 in the morning, I can't help it... ;)
Source of that image:
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/images/features/11-13tabletpc2.jpg
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/images/features/11-13tabletpc2.jpg
How lame, copying Microsoft!
I couldn't agree more. I would never expect apple to copy microsoft by copying microsoft because the copied apple. That didn't make the slightest bit of sense. It is 2 in the morning, I can't help it... ;)
daveL
Mar 27, 05:38 PM
My PS3 was folding from Thursday through Saturday morning... well... at some point it froze, my PS3 bricked and now I have a new PS3.
I'm kinda scared to start it going again although I hear many people have left theirs on longer. I really want to fold (and the PS3 can fold well!) but I don't want to have to get a new PS3 every few days to do it...
Consider it a burn in test. If it can fold for a week, it will probably last years.
I'm kinda scared to start it going again although I hear many people have left theirs on longer. I really want to fold (and the PS3 can fold well!) but I don't want to have to get a new PS3 every few days to do it...
Consider it a burn in test. If it can fold for a week, it will probably last years.
player9
Sep 14, 12:03 AM
I did some more research on this and it appears that we will have to wait probably for the Linux programmers to port Foomatic to OSX. That is if Epson does not release a driver eventually.
I tried to follow the directions on this site, but this assumes that you are running Linux and that Foomatic is already installed, along with Ghostscript and CUPS. I was able to apply the PPD file for the EPL-5700 to my printer and see it in Print Center but the in between framework is missing: the cupsomatic script and Foomatic system. I can print but the printer does not respond, so CUPS is not sending the data to the printer.
I couldn't figure out where to put the cupsomatic script since OSX does not have the directory substructure of redhat.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/foomatic.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/cups-doc.html
I also found this site helpful:
http://www.danka.de/apple-cups-en/
I tried to follow the directions on this site, but this assumes that you are running Linux and that Foomatic is already installed, along with Ghostscript and CUPS. I was able to apply the PPD file for the EPL-5700 to my printer and see it in Print Center but the in between framework is missing: the cupsomatic script and Foomatic system. I can print but the printer does not respond, so CUPS is not sending the data to the printer.
I couldn't figure out where to put the cupsomatic script since OSX does not have the directory substructure of redhat.
http://www.linuxprinting.org/foomatic.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/cups-doc.html
I also found this site helpful:
http://www.danka.de/apple-cups-en/
Scarlet Fever
Jun 16, 08:48 PM
maybe the iTMS should be called the iTunes Media Shop...
kildraik
May 30, 05:52 PM
Yes, but they sorta specified the loop thing, so...
...Maybe because the road is a loop... oh, well!:rolleyes:
...Maybe because the road is a loop... oh, well!:rolleyes:
idkew
Oct 22, 10:33 PM
i don't know if i think i am old school. while i have been around since i don't think i have contrubuted to MR as much as some...
i don't feel near as close to the "crew" as it seems that eye an v and jello... are.
i don't feel near as close to the "crew" as it seems that eye an v and jello... are.
neoserver
May 31, 04:55 PM
Excuse me, but what link is that?
the one in the folding FAQ for Extreme Overclocking Folding Stats... its broken.
the one in the folding FAQ for Extreme Overclocking Folding Stats... its broken.
davecomp
Nov 1, 07:53 PM
downloading it right now got to give it to quark not makeing us pay more for this update finaly i get a break on the 1000 price tag
Dave
Dave
Brize
Apr 26, 05:43 AM
no. no. no.
You only have to pay a licence fee if you USE equipment to receive or record broadcast signals.
This has been discussed here before ad nauseum (because it is an important principle), but OWNERSHIP of a device that can receive broadcast signals is not the same as USING the device (which then requires a licence).
I think there's a further distinction to be made here. As I understand it, you can own a device capable of receiving broadcast television signals without having to purchase a licence, but it can't be set up to do so.
If the TV Licensing Authority search your premises and find a piece of equipment tuned in and set up to receive broadcast television signals, arguing that you don't actually use it for that purpose wouldn't absolve you of your liability.
You only have to pay a licence fee if you USE equipment to receive or record broadcast signals.
This has been discussed here before ad nauseum (because it is an important principle), but OWNERSHIP of a device that can receive broadcast signals is not the same as USING the device (which then requires a licence).
I think there's a further distinction to be made here. As I understand it, you can own a device capable of receiving broadcast television signals without having to purchase a licence, but it can't be set up to do so.
If the TV Licensing Authority search your premises and find a piece of equipment tuned in and set up to receive broadcast television signals, arguing that you don't actually use it for that purpose wouldn't absolve you of your liability.
miniConvert
May 20, 07:54 AM
Is it me or his he looking thin? Someone needs to buy him a McDonalds.
Nice shot of the store though - that really is something.
Nice shot of the store though - that really is something.
Doctor Q
Aug 27, 10:44 PM
Originally posted by MacAztec
I first came here by a link from MacSurfer in like 2001. I realized its a cool place, and I decided to keep posting. I see you just became a 68020, MacAztec. Congratulations!
So far, I've only convinced one other person to join MacRumors. I guess I travel in the wrong circles.
I first came here by a link from MacSurfer in like 2001. I realized its a cool place, and I decided to keep posting. I see you just became a 68020, MacAztec. Congratulations!
So far, I've only convinced one other person to join MacRumors. I guess I travel in the wrong circles.